ZODIAC CIPHERS
Richard Grinell, Coventry, England
  • Home
    • Search This Site With Google
    • My Interview on the Zodiac Killer Channel
    • The Mount Diablo Map and Code Solution
  • Zodiac News
    • Zodiac News Archives
    • Santa Barbara Attack
    • Cheri Jo Bates
    • The Confession
    • Riverside Desktop Poem
    • Bates Letter
    • The Forgotten Victims
    • Zodiac RSS Feed
    • Welsh Chappie - Zodiac News
  • Lake Herman Murders
    • Blue Rock Springs Attack
    • Vallejo Times Letter
    • Examiner Letter
    • Chronicle Letter
    • Complete 408 Cipher
    • Vallejo and Benicia Map
    • Kathie Snoozy and Debra Furlong Murders
    • Debut of Zodiac Letter
  • Lake Berryessa Attack
    • Presidio Heights Attack
    • Call to Chat Show
  • 340 Cipher
    • Bus Bomb Letter
    • Betsy Aardsma Murder
    • The Fairfield Letter
    • Melvin Belli Letter
    • Santa Barbara Murders 1970
    • Modesto Attack
    • My Name is Cipher
    • Dragon Card and Button Letter >
      • Phillips Road Map
    • The Sleeping Bag Murders
    • The Little List Letter
  • The Halloween Card
    • Lake Tahoe Disappearance
    • Los Angeles Times Letter
    • The Monticello Card
    • The Exorcist Letter
  • SLA Letter
    • Red Phantom Letter/American Greetings Card
    • The 1978 Letter
    • Zodiac Letters Real or Fake
    • Zodiac Documentary
    • Zodiac Killer Net Forum - Hot Topics
    • Unsolved Mysteries
    • The Colonial Parkway Murders
  • Suspects
    • Arthur Leigh Allen
    • Rick Marshall
    • Lawrence Kane
    • Theodore Kaczynski
    • Richard Gaikowski
    • Gareth Penn
    • Jack Tarrance

PRESIDIO HEIGHTS- ZODIAC PASSED TWICE?

1/11/2018

 
Picture
Robert Graysmith has been accused of many factual inaccuracies down the years, of which many are well-founded. One of these we shall revisit and explore whether it has any basis in truth. ​Michael Butterfield highlighted this 'inaccuracy' under the title Robert Graysmith-Separating Fact and Fiction, where Robert Graysmith notes the sighting of the Zodiac Killer incorrectly on two occasions, firstly on the TLC show The Ultimate Ten, by 3758 Jackson Street, and secondly, on Cherry Street 'lumbering along in the fog toward the Presidio'.
 
However, the reality is, we only have the word of Officer Donald Fouke on where he last saw the Zodiac Killer on October 11th 1969, and he also placed the murderer of Paul Stine in two locations. firstly, walking up a flight of stairs and approaching the residence of 3712 Jackson Street, and secondly, he last saw the Zodiac Killer turning north on Maple Street as he drove past.

If you are going to question the statements of Robert Graysmith, then you have to equally challenge the conflicting statements of Officer Donald Fouke in the November 12th 1969 interdepartmental police memorandum and the 2007 Zodiac documentary.  
But there may be a possibility that Robert Graysmith and Donald Fouke are both correct, and the Zodiac Killer was spotted at both locations. The three teenagers gave a second, more comprehensive account of the events that night, recalling their meeting with Armond Pelissetti at the intersection of Washington and Cherry, and the Zodiac Killer attempting to haul Paul Stine into an upright position behind the steering wheel of the taxicab. These recollections tally with Armond Pelissetti's statements in the 2007 documentary, along with the bloody right-handed fingerprint retrieved from the dividing panel between the driver side door and left rear passenger door. The statement of Lindsey that  "He ran to the corner of Cherry and watched as Zodiac continued his casual pace right up to the corner of Jackson & Cherry. At this exact point, the first SFPD car arrives with two officers. One, Pelissetti, approached Lindsey and tried to extract what was happening. The other officer went to the cab and found the bloody victim. While Pelissetti was asking questions, Lindsey was trying to explain that the suspect was in sight on Cherry St. By the time Pelissetti got the point, they both looked and the Zodiac was gone", does not tally with the timeline of Zodiac approaching the intersection of Jackson and Maple and being spotted by Donald Fouke.      

PictureView on Google maps
If Armond Pelissetti and Lindsey were both watching Zodiac as he approached the corner of Jackson and Cherry, then the Zodiac Killer still had 128 meters of traveling distance to reach 3712 Jackson Street, close to the intersection of Jackson and Maple. At an average walking speed of 1.4 m/s, this would take 91 seconds.
​If Armond Pelissetti only took 30 seconds to arrive en scene, and he got the initial radio broadcast at 9:58 pm, the time is now 9:58:30 pm.

Zodiac would therefore arrive at 3712 Jackson Street at approximately 10:00 pm, where he is spotted by Donald Fouke. But Donald Fouke's journey at approximately 30 mph from the intersection of Presidio Avenue and Washington Street, where he received the initial 9:58 pm broadcast, is just 60 seconds. He arrived at Jackson and Maple at 9:59 pm, so couldn't possibly have seen Zodiac here, who wouldn't have arrived until 10:00 pm. Zodiac cannot travel from the upper reaches of Cherry to the near intersection of Jackson and Maple in 30 seconds.

If Armond Pelissetti took 1 minute to arrive en scene and met with Lindsey, then they are both viewing Zodiac approach the intersection of Jackson and Cherry at 9:59 pm. Donald Fouke is also viewing Zodiac approaching the intersection of Jackson and Maple at 9:59 pm - and Zodiac cannot be in two places at once. But the Robert Graysmith statement of Zodiac being spotted somewhere near the intersection of Jackson and Cherry is certainly plausible. In the Zodiac book by Robert Graysmith it stated "The patrol reached Jackson and Cherry by 10:00 and saw a stocky man "lumbering" along in the fog toward the Presidio. The radio unit, Patrolmen Donald Fouke and Eric Zelms, looking for a black man, shouted to the stranger and asked if he had seen anything unusual in the last minute or so. The stocky man called out he'd seen a man waving a gun running east on Washington, and the patrol car sped off in that direction".
 
It would take Donald Fouke and Eric Zelms approximately 1 minute 15/20 seconds from the initial broadcast, to be somewhere between the 3758 Jackson Street residence and the Jackson/Cherry intersection, and would take Zodiac a similar time from the taxicab. Zodiac cannot reach the Jackson/Maple intersection at normal walking speed to be spotted by Donald Fouke and Eric Zelms, but their patrol car can reach Zodiac at the beginning of his journey east along Jackson Street. This would tally with the claims of Robert Graysmith, along with the sighting of Lindsey and Armond Pelissetti.    

PictureView on Google maps
According to Graysmith "Donald Fouke and Eric Zelms, looking for a black man, shouted to the stranger and asked if he had seen anything unusual in the last minute or so". This sounds perfectly feasible, because Donald Fouke had received the initial broadcast just over a minute previous.
Graysmith also stated "The stocky man called out he'd seen a man waving a gun running east on Washington, and the patrol car sped off in that direction". ​This would have resulted in Donald Fouke turning southbound on Cherry, and turning left (east) on Washington Street, past Armond Pelissetti and the crime scene - likely while Pelissetti was ushering the teenagers back to their residence. Noticing another officer was dealing with the crime scene, he proceeded east along Washington looking for the assailant. But does this make sense?

Zodiac stated in the November 9th 1969 'Bus Bomb' letter: "I was walking down the hill to the park when this cop car pulled up + one of them called me over + asked if I saw anyone acting suspicious or strange in the last 5 to 10 min + I said yes there was this man who was runnig by waveing a gun & the cops peeled rubber + went around the corner as I directed them + I disappeared into the park a block + a half away never to be seen again". If the Zodiac saw them go around the corner, then that corner may have been the Jackson/Cherry intersection. But why would he state the man waving the gun was heading east on Washington Street? Was there purpose behind this?

The Zodiac had murdered Paul Stine at the intersection of Washington and Cherry, but the trip sheet had recorded Washington and Maple, so had the Zodiac Killer subconsciously or deliberately directed the patrol car east to the area of Washington and Maple, in order to throw the police a false lead, so they would focus their search near that intersection. 

Donald Fouke stated in the 2007 documentary "He was putting his head down when he spotted the police car and turned into the entrance way of a house. By entrance way, I mean stairs, leading up that are concrete, to a path, that leads to a front door. Never saw him get to the top of the stairs. You want the address of that residence- 3712 Jackson Street".  But was Donald Fouke mistaken? The residence at 3758 Jackson Street conforms to his description of a flight of concrete stairs, leading to a path, that leads to a front door - and is closer to Cherry Street than 3712 Jackson Street. It is also exactly a "block and half away" from the thoroughfare of Spruce Street into the park - the last place eyewitnesses saw Zodiac that night. There is a reasonable argument to be had, that Donald Fouke passed Zodiac twice that night, leading to his two separate and distinct recollections, in the police memorandum and the 2007 documentary. Both of which have become muddled in time.    

Picture
The Zodiac Killer turns out of view from Lindsey Robbins and Armond Pelissetti, and heads down the hill towards 3758 Jackson Street, where he observes the patrol car of Donald Fouke approaching. He makes a snap decision to turn into the stairs of a residence and is spotted by the patrol car. Because he is white (and police are searching for a NMA), they ask him has he seen anything suspicious. He gratefully directs them south on Cherry and east on Washington Street, before continuing his journey down the hill. Donald Fouke travels two blocks on Washington Street to Spruce Street, searching for a black male, but finds nobody. Believing the assailant may have headed for the Presidio, he turns north on Spruce Street towards the thoroughfare entering Julius Khan playground, but fails to spot his charge. He turns west on Jackson Street and heads toward the Jackson and Maple intersection, where he spots the white male again - this time turning north on Maple. This would explain the timeline and the two different stories given by Donald Fouke in the police memorandum and 2007 Zodiac documentary. The journey time for Donald Fouke traveling at 30 mph, following the yellow directional markers above is approximately 1 minute, as is the time for Zodiac to walk from 3758 Jackson Street to the intersection of Jackson and Maple. Both journey times are comparable. 
PicturePolice memorandum. Click to view.
The police memorandum on the right states "Sir: I respectfully wish to report the following, that while responding to the area of Cherry and Washington Streets a suspect fitting the description of the Zodiac Killer was observed by officer Donald Fouke walking in an easterly direction on Jackson Street and then turn north on Maple Street. The subject was not stopped as the description received from communication was that of a negro male". The detail is particularly cautious and guarded. 

The question arises - did Donald Fouke pass the Zodiac twice? Firstly, walking up stairs to a residence, and then later, heading north on Maple. From his accounts in 1969 and 2007, we would have to believe he just plucked the second story out of thin air, or that both events did occur, but have been viewed as contradictory to one another, when this doesn't necessarily need to be the case, had he viewed the WMA on two distinct and separate occasions.

Donald Fouke passed the Zodiac on the second occasion, but still hadn't received the amended update after approximately two minutes 15 seconds. He doesn't need to attend the crime scene, because he has already seen this being taken care of, so heads towards Arguello Boulevard to search the park area. He now receives the second broadcast updating the description to a WMA. Realizing he may have just passed the suspect, last seen heading north on Maple, he turns east on West Pacific Avenue. He fails to find the suspect, so returns to Cherry Street where he meets up with Armond Pelissetti. The above is just a suggestion, hopefully incorporating both the accounts of Donald Fouke and Robert Graysmith, without pitting one against the other - and more importantly, blending all the recollections together in a plausible, if unlikely course of events   

Rubislaw 32 link
1/11/2018 03:55:14 pm

Thanks for the aerial shots,Richard.Most interesting.

Though admittedly,a struggle to offer much more,on ''how the horse bolted''.

Sad day,with Inspector Toschi,now departed to solve a taxi driver's murder,in a parallel universe.

Richard
1/11/2018 03:58:22 pm

Yes Rubislaw, the links to the past are sadly ebbing away. The corner of Washington and Cherry will be a lonely place this year.

Alex who be WelshChap
1/12/2018 08:32:42 am

You say Rich:

"According to Graysmith "Donald Fouke and Eric Zelms, looking for a black man, shouted to the stranger and asked if he had seen anything unusual in the last minute or so" & suggest thus is feasible. I would go one step further Rich in saying its feasible and exactly the same claim made by a Ps, 2 cops pulled myself, then a goof statement suggesting the encounter inclvolved a police car, more than one officer ("One of them called me over..." Implying there is at least two involved) that called him over which does make it likely this cop calling him was Eric seen as He was on the same side or closest to the sidewalk Zodiac was lumbering down, with Don further away on drivers left side.

I know Officially Don stated He did not know nor was aware if Zelms saw, let alone communicated with, this Jackson un-sub but the overwhelming probability is simply that Zelms probably saw the WMA before Fouke did.

Ray Jenkins
1/11/2018 05:52:04 pm

RIP Dave Toschi. Isn't there anybody living in SF who could continue his annual vigil at Washington and Cherry?

Ray Jenkins
1/11/2018 05:49:35 pm

Man, the Zodiac was so casual. Seems like after slaughtering Stine in cold blood he just strolled away. He apparently "lumbered" along on the steeper paths, but for the most part it was like he was out taking an evening stroll. Perhaps this was part of his ruse. He wanted to appear so ordinary that even the police would not consider him. The police could have (should have?) caught him easily. I know we have the benefit of hindsight, but it did appear that a number of missed opportunities and blunders conspired to allow the Zodiac to escape.

Sully link
1/11/2018 05:52:13 pm

No doubt, Dave went to the grave with many secrets from a tarnished career. Condolences to Dave Toschis' widow.

Alex Lewis
1/12/2018 01:22:57 am

What do you base that claim on, Sully? I am not disagreeing or suggesting I dont believe similar but, just wondering if you care to state what your basing that statement on?

Sully link
1/12/2018 09:53:55 pm

Prosecuting Attorney Chappie !!!

Thru the 60s and 70s, there WERE dirty sfpd cops. I CANNOT reveal sources OR say Dave Toschi was shady but he WAS aware of the dirty cops back then. And he went to his grave with secrets.....



I'm not on the witnessame stand

Alex Lewis
1/17/2018 04:40:34 pm

Sully. . . I find you in contempt! We shall adjourn for sentencing in two weeks.....

Three hundred & twenty-five years to life! No Parole!!!

😊

Alex Lewis
1/17/2018 07:20:18 pm

And Sully, careful now. . . having any sign of owning a sense of humour in the Z amateur sleuth community may result in your being charged with conspiracy to Not be serious at all times, an offence which carries a min term of life in exile or if found guilty of murdering The Divine Right of ...being constantly Serious, in the First Degree . . . . Electric Chair!!!

It appears that certain people do not understand humour and especially the tongue in cheek type. They declare it to be the Work of the devil and then call in Clergy.

Father Doubting Thomas Voigt and Father Saint Michael Morphine

Alex Lewis
1/17/2018 07:31:37 pm

"St. Michael Morphine, defend us in battle. Keep us safe from the snares and wickedness of the Devil. . .

In the name of Dominus, I command you to depart from us and return to your Hellish Realm of Demonic Non compliance!

The power of Mike compels you....!

Ray Jenkins
1/12/2018 01:42:42 am

Just chiming in here... Dave Toschi admitted to faking the fan letters about himself which were published in the newspaper. He was however cleared of faking the Zodiac letter.

Ray Jenkins
1/13/2018 06:19:21 pm

Agreed Sully! The thing that is scary about this is, what if the Zodiac was a cop?
The Oakland office was for many years tainted with bad cops, and there are plenty of news reports relating to this corruption dating back may years. So it did not really surprise me when an ex-Oakland cop named Barry Wysling, was suspected at one time of being the Zodiac by some amateur sleuths. He probably was not the Zodiac, but when you look at the work environment during the time of his employment, there is pause to wonder...

Sully link
1/13/2018 08:38:37 pm

Hey Ray! How cud someone figure Barry Wysling to be Zodiac lol! Thats actually comical but everyone HAS TO HAVE their pet suspect. Whos been on your radar, past or presently?

Ray Jenkins
1/14/2018 02:18:00 am

You are mistaken entirely. I have no suspects, pet or otherwise. If I mention any suspects I always say they are other people's suspects, which is exactly what I have done on this occasion. The Zodiac cud of been anybody. Sorry that you had to waste your time by posting a banal comment.

Alex Lewis
1/17/2018 05:03:09 pm

Ray, David Toschi was cleared by who of taking the 78 letter? Sherwood M?

RubisLaw said this also a few weeks ago in ruling D.T out as author of
a forget and, most clearly, the 1978 letter was and sthus still is a genuine
Z letter. RubisLaw stated this when I said I was sure it was not a genuine Z letter. I can't be bothered to argue the fact that the actual Questioned Document Examiner stated the letter was a forgery and one that he said had many similarities to Todchi's writing. Rubislaw dismisses any claim it was authored by Toschi and pointa to Sherwood's opinion. He either doesnt know or doesnt want to say that S.H said He had grown close to Tosch i throughout the investigation and considered Him a close Colleague & good friend who, He said, is above reproach.

Alex Lewis
1/22/2018 04:25:16 am

Yeah it's unfortunate that there was, is and always will be corruption to some degree in those we entrust to seve and protect. You can never justify the actions of a corrupt cop who interprets 'To serve & Protect' to mean specifically 'the Mafia' just as example.

But when you do hear of a cop busted for being in the pocket of a John Gotti on the Gambino payroll at least the motive of that dirty cop is quite evident as to be one of greed. what I don't understand is the police or in this case, former police officer, Steve Balidino (think that's how it is spelled). He came fwd to state that while it was now missing and had been for some years, there was an actual recording of Zodiacs voice & His entire call to Vallejo Police Dpt. to announce "I want to report a double murder..."

The former cop even took a seat to affirm this on camera for a documentary. This was at a time before Nancy Slover had been found and came out of obscutity to speak about that incident. When Shs did, naturally the question of Her & Z's conversation being recorded on a tape was brought up and the claim of Officer Balidino. Slover stated no such recoding existed then or now and She said: "I don't know why Mr Balidino would suggest there is a tape that exists of My Call with the man who turned out to be Zodiac because as a former police officer this Gentleman should be smart enough to know that back in 1969 we did not record incoming calls to the Spt. Switchboard because of the simple fact that that technology did not exist at that time."

When Slovers comments were put to Sfeve Balidino He came out and admitted he was lying and had not been played any such recording.

I view something like this from afar and ask rhetorically: " Ok Steve and now. . . . Why? What is the point?"

It not possible to prove a negative and so no tape will ever turn up because you can't produce a thing that does not exist so I don't get what he and people like that want or hope to achieve?

Can't prove a negative, not possible. Can prove A human being a liar though, and quite easily

Hontely don't get it. If your a bit of kook, a sandwich short of a picnic as they say then your allowed to claim fictious non happenings as factual events, like Deb Perez believable claim of being the biological and illigitimate daughter of John F. Kennedy who hushed his scandalous infidelity up by adopting baby Perez on the hush hush and would you flipping believe it, get placed into caring arms of.... 'Daddy ZODIAC!!!' Talk about bad start in life, 🤔🤔🤔

To close, lest I rantnon for another Seven paragraphs, my point is to say I don't see the point. Government will deliberately put out many different statements or versions of a singular event purposely as official policy a document discivered once said in order that the truth gets lost, buried among all the lies and falsities.

To end, A paraphrasing of Neil Armstrongs address at the WhiteHouse is applicable to Zodiacs cold case in that. . .

"To you, we say, this is only the beginning! We leave you much that is undone. To you We say, there is much to be uncovered, great discoveries to be made by those that can removev one of truths protective layers..."


Rubislaw 32 link
1/12/2018 04:00:35 am

Yes,perhaps of interest to focus on 1978.And I am sure it does not compromise respect for Mr.Toschi,if we do.

Three ''believed'' letters from Zodiac,in April,May and July of that year.

April : ....city pig Toschi is good,but I am smarter and better....

May : The Channel Nine letter....the Manson/Beatles connection.

July : The typed letter to the Chronicle...small metallic tape,friction tape and Scotch tape.

In a nutshell : Then retired documents examiner,Sherwood Morrill had all three as ''authentic Zodiac''.So did a further three documents examiners.

News breaks that someone has unearthed Toschi's self penned fan mail,from two years prior.

Toschi is then accused of having written the April 1978 letter from Zodiac.

The four documents examiners review the three 1978 letters.

The three documents examiners,in public employment are now ''undecided''....but retired Morrill remains adamant that all three 1978 letters are from Zodiac.

Morrill stands in Toschi's corner,with public support.But to no avail in Toschi's removal from the Stine case.

The Stine case was now nine years old,with no solution.

Recriminations,with a scapegoat required [?].

Was Toschi stitched up and shafted ?

Ray Jenkins
1/12/2018 04:56:11 am

My personal feeling, based on the handwriting style and tone of the letter, as well as its subject matter, is that Sandra Good or another Manson follower penned the 1978 Channel 9 letter. In fact if you look in the FBI files and read between the lines, they seem to imply that Good wrote this letter, but as she was already serving time for posting threatening letters, she could not be convicted twice for the same offense.

It is possible that this was one of the earlier batch of letters that she wrote, but this one got held back for some reason and only got sent later, perhaps by some devout Manson groupie(?). She may have even penned it from inside the jail and smuggled it out so that someone else could post it. I suspect this would not have been impossible in those days.

Whatever the case, the Manson connection was obvious, as it gave the return address in "witchy" reversed writing as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,A.G.C.G.T.H. ("All Good Children Go to Heaven"). This was a message to the police, who soon realized that the same taunting lyric had been found written on a door at the Spahn Ranch.

It seems that other wannabes were avidly borrowing from the Zodiac from the early 1970s to advertize their own agendas and apparent need for publicity for their own political and anti-social "causes".

Sully link
1/14/2018 03:30:12 pm

Hey Ray - My question wasnt meant to be a slight to you. On th contrary, youve been researching this murder mystery longer than most. Starting to feel most posters hold their cards close to their chest now. Too bad.

Ray Jenkins
1/14/2018 07:12:50 pm

Okay thanks for explaining. Sorry for my earlier abrupt reply. I was feeling a bit tired and fed up. Yep, I've been researching it a while now but sad to say I am still none the wiser. I have no hidden cards. What you see is what you get. I have wondered about various people, the usuals, then others like Robert Durst and his long association with the area close to Riverside and his similarities to the sketches, and I've wondered about other potential suspects from time to time, even the complete "wildcards" like Dennis Rader and Ted Kaczynski. But there never seems to be anything conclusive and all I ever end up with are a few circumstantial leads. The only reason I thought Wysling was a tad interesting is due to his Freemason, Elks, Pythian connection and the Zodiac's symbolism. But basically all we really know about him is that he was a sick old man. We were presented with various allegations that may or may not have been true, and parts of the story seemed highly suspect. I must say that any notion that the Zodiac's identity may one day be revealed is not looking good. Partial and potentially contaminated DNA and prints, conflicting witness testimonies, potentially corrupt and inefficient police work in the past, jurisdictions that failed to share and co-operate fully by withholding critical evidence, fading memories, a huge amount of time passing by... no, it is not looking good at all!

Rubislaw 32 link
1/17/2018 11:09:30 pm

Following the revelation of Toschi sending fan mail to himself,the April 1978 letter,came ''under the microscope'',in particular,because the letter had mentioned Toschi [....that city pig...].

So,three documents examiners and Morrill examined the letter again,having all four found it to be ''Zodiac authentic''.

This time,the three documents examiners found it ''indeterminable''...but Morrill found it to be still ''Zodiac authentic''.

Morrill was retired,by that time,and knew that his word would be ''outweighed'' by the three examiners,in employment.

Enough seed of doubt had been sown over the April 1978 letter,to give the SFPD a good enough reason to move him on,in the force.

But the decision had probably been forced on the SFPD,by the CA DOJ.

As Robert Graysmith pointed out,the ''fan mail'' episode may have mortally wounded the Stine case as a winnable one,on its own,in a court of law.

And,the ''official'' doubt,now on the April 1978 letter,allowed extra reason to punish Toschi,if there was any criticism of the department's decision to re-assign Toschi.

Naturally,Morrill thought Toschi had been stitched up.

Rubislaw 32 link
1/18/2018 12:03:31 am

Just to add,the April 1978 letter,has never been officially deemed a ''Forgery''.Anyone that states this is misrepresenting its status.

With all the fuss surrounding it,perhaps we could call it an ''Inbetweeny'' [?]

Rubislaw 32 link
1/12/2018 06:15:50 am

Granted Ray,and of course ''no one'' is going to arrive at a definitive answer on many of the ''unconfirmed'' letters,until the case is solved.

The Channel Nine letter and Count Marco letter are ''far and away'' different in style,from most other communications.Those other letters from '78,'86 and '87 saw a ''Zodiac'' merely resorting to ''spidery'' handwriting.

My feelings are that the Chanel Nine letter ''might'' be Zodiac,because he himself felt eclipsed by the ''Manson'' phenomenon....as well as,of course,the fact that The Beatles could always steal a headline,at that time.

Part of my ''beef'' with law enforcement,at present,is actually over the July 19th 1978 typed letter,for which we,the public,have not been privy.

At present,''we'' only have Robert Graysmith's word to trust [....which I do...].

The content of that letter is very individualistic,and in keeping with Zodiac's cryptic manner and penchant for riddles.

It's a smoking gun,waiting to go off,at any time [!].

A prediction for 2018.

Ray Jenkins
1/12/2018 02:45:39 pm

My personal feeling is the Channel 9 letter was not Zodiac. Different handwriting, different subject matter, and solely concerned with Manson's agenda. I did some handwriting comparisons of my own one time and came to the conclusion it was a very good match with Good's writing, particularly her younger style of writing. Her angry style of social and political commentary virtually drips from every sentence in the letter.

My own gut feeling is that every letter from '78 onwards were not written by the Zodiac, but by different copycats wanting to use the media limelight to gain publicity for their own agendas and / or misdeeds. The postcard was an obvious forgery sent in by some wannabe joker.

As for what happened to the Zodiac post-Stine, that is still anybody's guess. Either he faded into obscurity due to illness, incarceration, or death, or he moved elsewhere. Or he is still out there, far less communicative and active, but nevertheless causing occasional mischief by stalking a number of paranoid women in different ways and tormenting them by leaving cryptic messages on their doorstep... lol! Well you already know what I think about the latter. :-)

Alex Lewis
1/12/2018 08:16:14 am

3758 Jackson street is a possibility until you stop to recall Foukes stating that dispute Him "Never saw Him get to the top of the stairs. . . . " He did, nonetheless, state for ABC's Primetime that he saw this WMA going onto a pathway & disappeared into a homes courtyard...."

I think its time to give up!!!

Ray Jenkins
1/12/2018 02:55:25 pm

I guess this is the problem with cases that become highly publicized. The media spotlight skews perceptions, and if any witness is the slightest bit prone to exaggeration or likes to bask in their "50 seconds of fame", they may be very prone to change details in order to embellish their stories. In the end we are left with changed and/or conflicting statements. The Zodiac case is literally bloated and drunk with embellished and conflicting statements. There are clear warnings here for law enforcement, to avoid at all costs the over-publicity of crimes, ("trial by media"), especially those crimes perpetrated by serial killers. The media has a lot of power and are not always altruistic in their intentions. They are after a "good story" first and foremost. They permit the freedoms for witnesses to "expand on" and "extend" their stories. The Zodiac case was so well-publicized that it became a media circus in fact, and this has continued unabated to this day via the online community. Let's face it, give some people enough rope in the spotlight and they will surely hang themselves.

Sully link
1/16/2018 11:40:57 pm

Alex -
To quote John McEnroe, YOU CANT BE SERIOUS!!! That is.. about giving up on the most dangerous game. Can I send an e-mail? What is your address? Thx.

Alex Lewis
1/20/2018 01:09:39 pm

I'm afraid I am Sully, and this will be one's Third Retirement from this case. The previous other two occasions when I in retirement I was emailed out of enjoying my retirement by people, one of which said they were concerned that I had been silenced by Zodiac and I replied that No Zodiac hadn't come after me yet, and that I was highly offended that he hadn't.

But no, I can't retire and go away Sully because I must be here in the event the case is solved to interview A certain person who I shall not name here but simply refer to him as 'The Voidey Phantom' to ask Tom, I mean Vodwy Z-Fan can he comment on the Cleared of Suspicion and non guilty verdict in relation to GAIKowski. I highlight GAIK as to not confuse this with Z Ciphers GYKE, which is circumstantial evidence of nothing because Richard never signed himself that name with a Y.

Alex Lewis
1/20/2018 06:30:36 pm

Can you send an email? I don't know it would depend on whether you have an email account/address or not as to if you can or cannot send emails. Ha. Sorry I am unable to stop myself when it comes to being sarcastic. Lack of impulse control to be a sarcastic twit.

If you meant can you send myself a message via email then yes you most certainly can. My email address, believe it or not, is 'WelshChappie@aol.com'

Reply sad and when I receive your message. TTFN

Drew
1/12/2018 07:42:04 pm

Hi Richard, I may be confused but I was under the impression that Pelissetti arrived while the kid was on the corner of wash/cherry watching Zodiac walk away, and that the kid alerted him to this, but Zodiac was gone by the time Pelissetti registered what was being said.

If Zodiac was walking a bit faster and was farther down cherry, and if the house in question is the closer residence that Graysmith indicates, then it seems possible that some of these things could have all happened: The kid spots Z but Pelissetti doesn't, Fouke sees him but not so near maple, Z fakes entering the residence with concrete steps as Fouke moves on with the search, then Zodiac makes his way to the park, lingers long enough to take in the search details, then drives off.

I hope that was somewhat coherent or helpful for further discussion - I just want to keep you encouraged with this particular pursuit because this nitty gritty detail work is all we have to work with here.

Thanks man

Richard
1/12/2018 09:01:52 pm

Yes, I could have worded it better Drew, such as "If Armond Pelissetti and Lindsey were both present as Zodiac approached the corner of Jackson and Cherry" rather than watched. In truth, the Jackson/Maple sighting by Fouke is likely the only sighting, but I just wanted to consider the alternative and find an explanation for Graysmith pointing out this address. Robert Graysmith twisted many things to fit Arthur Leigh Allen, but stating this particular location wasn't beneficial to his cause in any way- he had little to gain. Either he read this location in a document, got told this location or made an error. But there would seem little reason to simply conjure it up from nowhere.

Drew
1/15/2018 11:58:53 am

Hi Richard, Tahoe brought up something interesting to question the bogus dispatch conspiracy theory - that the Fouke memo was not leaked to the press. I assume this is correct.

I have come to believe that the BMA dispatch did occur afterall, because the alternative would suggest that Fouke was tasked to write the memo and it was intended to be leaked in an operation orchestrated by Fouke’s superiors to cover up the goof that the november Zodiac letter illuminated so publicly. I have thought that the coverup was a worthy theory but it kind of falls apart if the memo isn’t leaked. As far as I can tell it was not publicly known until Graysmith. I now think Fouke wrote the memo of his own accord to clarify his position, rather than as an order from his superiors.

Something that still troubles me though is that if the suspect description developed from the Robbins sighting was ammended to reflect the Fouke sighting after it became known that the suspect was Zodiac but before the memo, then Fouke’s superiors must have already known his position (so why was the memo necessary?) One document that could clarify things (and maybe this is where Graysmith obtained the address) is the Fouke ‘scratch’ (that’s how he referred to it in the 2007 interview) written on the night of the Paul Stine murder.

Richard
1/15/2018 01:32:52 pm

I certainly couldn't prove the NMA story was fabricated- without an admission by somebody it's far too late in the day for that. The memorandum was not leaked to the press, because nobody ever wrote about the negro male. The trouble with the memorandum in my eyes, is that it was only signed by Fouke, not written by him. The first lines ""Sir: I respectfully wish to report the following, that while responding to the area of Cherry and Washington Streets a suspect fitting the description of the Zodiac Killer was observed by officer Donald Fouke," does not sound as coming from him. The phrase "the suspect was observed by officer Fouke" again doesn't sound like a personal recollection- more like a third party talking about Fouke's recollections. Then at the very end of the memorandum it switches back to the first person perspective "My partner that night was officer E Zelms. I do not know if he observed the suspect or not". Who is writing this memo. Nevertheless, whether it was released or not, until Graysmith times, it's always there on the record if the police were ever questioned on their ineptitude that night.
What amazes me about the last line of this memo, is that Donald Fouke was extremely observant of a white male that night, down to rear graying hair,elasticated cuffs and tan engineering boots, when he's looking for a NMA. He is very detailed about the suspect, yet he doesn't even know if his own partner is awake or saw anything whatsoever. His attention to detail considering he was driving was notable, considering Zelms was on the side of the vehicle closest to the sidewalk. His notable absence of contribution is telling and suggests to me either Fouke or his superiors protected him in some way, because he was a rookie. The 6.29 am 12th October 1969 police report is signed by Pelissetti, but contains no mention of the Fouke sighting, or his input whatsoever. Why, when this was so critical to the unfolding events. There may have been no conspiracy Drew, but the description passed out begs the question and the complete lack of transparency about the mistake given out to officers , coupled with the timing of the memorandum only 3 days after Zodiac's letter is very telling. It may not have been leaked, but it's always there if horrible questions arise at a later date. The NMA description is forever an escape clause. Have a read of the memo again and consider whether the switching between the first and third perspective indicates this memorandum was personally written by Fouke, or his description of the suspect was added into a prewritten statement by somebody else. But Drew, I couldn't swear by the NMA story being concocted with 100% confidence. I could very well be wrong. I wish I had a crystal ball.

Tahoe27
1/15/2018 01:37:28 pm

Hi Drew--

Sorry to butt in... Fouke has maintained he was not involved with the revised composite. It has been said the kids thought it needed revision--to make him appear older. It seems strange to me that Fouke's opinion would not be taken into consideration, unless he said.."yah, looks about right", but Fouke seems to say they didn't come to him at all. More questions arise from this because I find that hard to believe!

Drew
1/15/2018 02:44:17 pm

Good points Richard, I really should have reread the memo before spouting off about it. The perspective change is curious, but not necessarily indicative of a work authored by Fouke's superiors. I am not sure what to make of it. On one hand I would expect a memo written as a defence for the department would be more carefully edited. On the other hand, I certainly wouldn't expect Fouke to have been less careful about the language or switched perspective for any reason. So, I guess I am back on the fence!

Either way I still think the Fouke must have a) stopped the suspect or b) conferred with Zelms in order to compile so much detail in his description.

Tahoe, I believe Pelissetti's 2007 assertion that Fouke did not approach him with the information that he had stopped or seen anyone, if only because Fouke's protocol would more likely to have been to report the incident to a detective. The reason I believe Fouke's sighting was considered in the amended Oct 18 Zodiac profile (not necessarily the sketch) is that they raised to the age from 25-30 to 35-45. This was before the Zodiac chimed in with his anecdote about the cops pulling a goof. What I had not considered was that it was the Robbins who felt the sketch needed aging.

Richard
1/15/2018 03:22:39 pm

Tahoe is correct, it's very difficult to believe. The police report compiled only hours after the search was suspended, signed by Pelissetti and Peda, although contains no mention of Fouke or his sighting, it clearly contains his description on page 2. ​It states this on the second page '#2 SUSPECT: WMA, in his early forties, 5'8", heavy build, reddish-blond, crew cut hair. wearing eyeglasses, dark brown trousers, dark (navy blue or black) "Parka" jacket, dark shoes. Suspect should have many blood stains on his person and clothing, suspect may also be in possession of the keys to the Yellow Cab, possibly has wallet belonging to the victim. Last seen walking north on Cherry Street, from Washington Street'.
http://www.zodiackiller.com/StineReport2.html
The three teenagers hadn't amended their description at 6.29 am on the 12th October 1969, so this SUSPECT#2, in his early 40's by deduction must be Donald Foukes's. But again, the next line states suspect "last seen walking north on Cherry Street, from Washington Street". If this was the last time anybody saw Zodiac that night, what about this description, clearly given by Fouke after observing a subject near the intersection of Jackson and Maple. They believed this sighting enough to include the description of the subject, but not enough to detail the location of the sighting and by whom- Donald Fouke. Again, the omission is questionable, and to supposedly then not include the police officer's observational skills in the sketch in preference to three teenagers presumably viewing from 50-60 feet away, with limited visibility is extraordinary. The comparison between the teenagers and the sighting of Fouke should have told them that this was the same person, only separated by an age discrepancy. The time of travel for Zodiac from the crime scene to Jackson/Maple of 3 mins and Fouke's journey time should have told them it couldn't be anybody else but the same person. They labelled him as #2 SUSPECT, as though they were only considering it an option.

Richard
1/15/2018 03:30:52 pm

If Pelissetti signed off a report including Fouke's description, this would suggest he should have had at least knowledge of Fouke's sighting. If this wasn't Fouke's sighting, then it begs the question-who was it that gave this older description before Zodiac departed Cherry Street. Was it a conflicting observation by one of the three teenagers. My bet is that it's Fouke's description and Pelissetti signed off on it.

Drew
1/15/2018 04:03:14 pm

I have an idea that is doubtful at best, but here goes... The only other person observed that night to my knowledge was a man 'standing on a lawn' or 'walking a dog' - but if this guy was a "suspect" then surely information about him would have been collected that night and included in the report (and you probably would have written an entire article about him by now). Is this vaguely referenced person likely to be who Pelissetti was referring to?

Richard
1/15/2018 04:15:45 pm

This was Kjell Qvale, who lived at 3636 Jackson St. Pelissetti did mention him in the 2007 documentary, but dismissed him on grounds of age and 'no blood'. Kjell Qvale was born in 1919, so would have been 50 on October 11th 1969. He is favoured by Zodiac researcher Mike Rodelli.

Richard
1/15/2018 04:18:04 pm

http://zodiackillermystery.freeforums.net/thread/8/suspect-aka-kjell-qvale

Drew
1/15/2018 04:20:38 pm

Thanks for clarifying Richard. I can't imagine who else Pelissetti was referring to - had to be the person Fouke saw.

Richard
1/15/2018 04:21:30 pm

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=bPFFDwAAQBAJ&pg=PT95&lpg=PT95&dq=mike+rodelli+zodiac+book+norway+runes&source=bl&ots=h1i2KfSQyd&sig=-SrT50Iu4pmzdf7gCSUfrCA5APk&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjtxPP_mtvYAhXOEVAKHUDGDuAQ6AEIRjAI#v=onepage&q=mike%20rodelli%20zodiac%20book%20norway%20runes&f=false

Richard
1/15/2018 04:22:40 pm

When you land on link, scroll to the top.

Alex Lewis
1/20/2018 06:47:15 pm

Well it is alleged to have been Kjell Armond briefly saw and spoke with, but Kjell was aware of this claim and He outright denied not only being out around the area that night, but said he was not even in Pacific Heights area, nor San Fran and in gfact claimed he was out of State on a business trip in the England.

Pelisswtti has never publicly said it was Qvale, he hasn't given any name as to who he claimed to encounter that night and officially refers to his encountering a dog walker at Jaxkson and Maple intersection.

When Mile Rodelli circulated the claim it was Qvale Armond saw and spoke with Armond himself fefuted this by calling Rodelli on the phone and telling Him he is wrong and that "Your suspect was not in Presidio Heights that night"

It is again a case of 'pick one' because there claim, counter claim, rebuttal, counter claim and round and round the Presidio events we begin to go.

Alex Lewis
1/20/2018 06:59:01 pm

In speaking to Michael Butterfield about His having had a conversation with Pelissetti about the Stine event Butterfield confirmed he had spoke to Armond over the phone around 9 years ago now and told me recently that made what he called "Several Bizarre statement" and quote: "Made several contradictory statements" but he did elaborate and say what they were.

Rubislaw 32 link
1/15/2018 05:51:11 pm

I am sure that Mr.Rodeli has poured much loving care and attention into his book.

A ''journey'' perhaps,into his persuading that Mr.Qvale may have murdered Paul Stine [?].

From everything I have read on this ''angle'',Law Enforcement will not be moved one jot,on Mr.Rodeli's inclinations.

From what was initially assessed,that evening,Mr.Qvale could not have physically been in a position,to have executed Stine.

But Qvale could have been a ''signalman'' for the man who did murder Stine.

It took the SFPD and FBI 32 years to be satisfied that he wasn't a signalman,either.

Qvale's wealth and indignant stance,appears to have been a recipe for long drawn out belligerence,in his relationship with L.E.

He could afford good lawyers.

Ray Jenkins
1/15/2018 06:02:40 pm

A lot of the above discussion provides some traction to the idea there may have been two Zodiacs, who either operated independently or were know to each other. What would be the chances of a killer operating in the SF city area becoming a Zodiac copycat? He may have noticed that his own handwriting looked so similar that he could pass it off as the Zodiac, or maybe the writer was just acknowledging the crimes of the other? Perhaps somebody wanted to get rid of Stine for some reason and used the Zodiac persona to obscure his identity and the real links to the crime? I am just wildly speculating here, but it always seems to me that the person who committed the earlier country crimes was a younger man, except perhaps for the man who abducted Kathleen Johns. The culprit at the Stine killing seemed somewhat older to the perp from Lake Berryessa, in my limited estimation of things.

Alex Lewis
1/20/2018 07:17:23 pm

The more than one Zodiac theory, or if not more than one actively killing then a conspiracy at least whereby others were involved or knew of the crimes and who was committing then etc I would say if your instinct is to say no and dismiss the idea, go watch the very interesting documentary 'Son of Sam Speaks' in which David Berkowitz names accomplices and his allegations of a conspiracy are fact checked and endorsed by at least one Retired NY Detective who is believes David is telling nothing but factually provable truth.

Berkowitz agrees to being the shooter in one of SOS murders but was at all of the shootings acting as a lookout along with several other co-conspirators and said there were a few very powerful people involved and said even today (as he talked of this) these people could get to him very easily and prison is no obsticle.

Within a few Months David Berkowitz was viciously attacked in prison and since that attack has point blank refused to talk about the case and will not discuss the cult and members of the process church that he spoke about in that in camera interview.

Anybody not yet watched Son of Sam Speaks I would strongly recommend it, it can be found on YouTube by a simple Search via YouTube: Son of Sam Speaks.

Alex Lewis
1/20/2018 07:22:46 pm

https://youtu.be/4JepFcuZVuo

Link to Son of Sam Speaks Documentary above.

Rubislaw 32 link
1/15/2018 06:30:20 pm

I certainly take on board,what you have said,Ray.

After all these years,I feel that L.E. have called it correctly,with their ''allocation'',on what Zodiac was responsible for....except the abduction of Kathleen Johns,which was a decision on ''confirmation'',in order to encourage Zodiac to continue writing [....it worked...].

This includes Zodiac as a single ''armed and dangerous'' person.

Mr.Qvale was,by all accounts,a happy,generous,grateful,contented businessman and individual.....popular and respected.It just doesn't seem that someone with so much to live for,would risk so much,for even a ''dark'' side,that might be within him.

Anything I might add,in complimenting Mr,Rodeli,for his acheivement,might only sound patronising.

But,the proof will be in the pudding...and L.E. will not be lifting an index finger,to pick their noses,over Mr.Rodeli's new book.

Ray Jenkins
1/15/2018 06:57:27 pm

"L.E. will not be lifting an index finger,to pick their noses."

When it comes to the Zodiac case, I can only reply by asking "When do they ever?" :-)

Rubislaw 32 link
1/16/2018 12:48:44 am

Absolutely [!]....or,so it would seem.

I have been thinking recently,about all the reports,of further forensics analysis,taking place.

The general assumption,among many website contributors,is that L.E. would be publicly announcing who ''wasn't'' the Zodiac,at sometime,in the future.

I can't imagine why [?!].When have they ever considered the public's curiosity,or concern,in all these years [?].

No,it seems that the likeliest reason,is a recent agreement,for all remaining forensic materials to be tested,with findings placed on a giant,but figurative table,at the California DOJ.

Apart from the realisation,that there is probably only about ten years left,to bring someone to justice,there are actually indications of movements,in the case [...I speculate...].

Indeed,and I further venture [...controversially...],that James Comey's firing,by Donald Trump,was not just about Mrs.Clinton's e-mails and questionable Russian intervention,in the last U.S Presidential election.

Mr.Trump said two things,at the time of Mr.Comey's departure.Firstly that Mr.Comey was ''showboating''...which Mr.Trump would know a thing or two about [!].And...that ''we'',the American public,would thank him for this decision,in the future.

Brickbats are welcome in my direction,but.....I do believe that part of the reason,for Mr.Trump's dismissal of Comey was....because the California DOJ had complained to Mr.Trump,that they had found out that Comey had entered into a private agreement,with a foreign ''senior law enforcer'',over cases related to the Zodiac case....at the exclusion of the California DOJ.

Rubislaw 32 link
1/17/2018 03:01:20 am

If anyone is a little bemused by my last comment,I will just add that the ''private agreement'' took place on Friday 19th December,in Washington,when the two ''senior law enforcers'' met,under ''officially'' different circumstances.

Ordinarily,a US President would not have frequent liaison with an FBI Director.The Director is usually answerable to the US DOJ.

It appears that Mr.Trump fired Mr.Comey,following complaints about Mr.Comey,from the US DOJ.

So,it is possible that the original ''complainant'' was the CA DOJ.

Currently,assigned investigator,Robert Mueller,is trying to establish the precise reason why Mr.Trump fired Mr.Comey.

Mr.Mueller should visit your site,Richard....and zodiackillermystery.freeforums.net .....in order to find out why Trump fired Comey [!].

There is ''big trouble'' with a much smaller government,over this,also.

It all gets ''curiouser and curiouser'',and analogies with ''Alice through the Looking Glass'' are never far away..


Comments are closed.
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    All
    13 Hole Postcard
    148 Character Cipher
    1978 Letter
    1986 Letter
    1987 Letter
    2001 Happy New Year Card
    Albany Letter
    Allan/Peyton Murders
    Arthur Leigh Allen
    Atlanta Letter
    Betsy Aardsma
    Blue Rock Springs Attack
    Bus Bomb Letter
    Button Letter
    Call To Chat Show
    Carol Beth Hilburn
    Channel 9 Letter
    Cheri Jo Bates
    Cipher Theories
    Citizen Card
    Concerned Citizen Card
    Confession Letter
    Daniel Williams Poisoning
    Debut Of Zodiac Letter
    Deep Real Estate Ad
    DMV Letter
    Domingos/Edwards Murders
    Donald Lee Bujok
    Donna Lass
    Dragon Card
    Earl Van Best Jr
    Eureka Card
    Exorcist Letter
    Fairfield Letter
    Fingerprint Evidence
    Forecast For Cancer
    Forecast For Leo
    Gareth Penn
    General News Articles
    Gilbert And Sullivan
    Good Citizen Letter
    Halloween Card
    Hood/Garcia Murders
    Internet Articles
    Joan Webster
    Judith Hakari
    Kevin Robert Brooks
    Lake Berryessa Attack
    Lake Herman Road Murders
    Lake Tahoe Disappearance
    Larry Kane
    Leona Roberts Murder
    Los Angeles Letter
    Melvin Belli Letter
    Mike Morford (Morf13)
    Modesto Attack
    Molina/Rodriguez Murders
    Monticello Card
    My Name Is Letter
    Nancy Bennallack
    New Canaan Letters
    Novato Letter
    Oakland A's Letter
    Pines Card
    Possible Zodiac Attacks
    Possible Zodiac Letters
    Presidio Heights Murder
    Radians
    Red Phantom Letter
    Richard Gaikowski
    Riverside Desktop Poem
    Robert Salem Murder
    Ross Sullivan
    Saechao/Saelee Murders
    San Jose Code Letter
    Santa Claus Card
    Scotch Tape Letter
    Sla Letter
    Tamalpais Valley Attack
    Ted Kaczynski
    Telegraph Avenue Incident
    The 340 Cipher
    The 408 Cipher
    The Celebrity Cypher
    The Little List
    The Mikado
    Thomas Horan
    You Are Next Letter
    Zodiac Letters Poll
    Zodiac Postage
    Zodiac Theories

    Picture

    RSS Feed

    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    The Zodiac Killer may have given us the answer almost word-for-word when he wrote PS. The Mt. Diablo Code concerns Radians & # inches along the radians. The code solution identified was Estimate: Four Radians and Five Inches To read more, click the image.
    Picture
    Picture
    The Zodiac Atlas: The Zodiac Killer Enigma by Randall Scott Clemons. Click image for details.
    Picture
    The Zodiac Killer Map: Part of the Zodiac Killer Enigma by Randall Scott Clemons. Click image for color version
    For black and white issue..
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture
    Picture

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    July 2012
    January 2012

Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
Photos used under Creative Commons from Marcin Wichary, zAppledot, vyusseem, Alex Barth, Alan Cleaver, jocelynsart, Richard Perry, taberandrew, eschipul, MrJamesAckerley