Inspector William J. Hamlet One of the more fascinating parts of their analysis involves Inspector William Hamlet from the crime laboratory of the San Francisco Police Department and the eight latent fingerprints found on two pages of the five-page "Little List" letter mailed on July 26th 1970. which included a left ring finger latent that bore a similarity to a bloody latent fingerprint retrieved from the door of the Ford Galaxie 500 taxicab of Paul Stine. This means that there is a possibility that the bloody left ring finger of the Zodiac Killer was the digit that touched the outside front right passenger door handle of the taxicab. The bloody fingerprint/s retrieved from the dividing panel to the right of the driver side door, were highly unlikely to have been deposited by the left hand of Zodiac (or anybody else other than Zodiac). The Robbins children claimed that the Zodiac Killer opened the driver side door from the outside and attempted to pull the lifeless body of Paul Stine into an upright position. This could only reasonably have been achieved if the Zodiac had braced his right hand against the dividing panel of the taxicab for leverage. But how was William Hamlet able to conclude it was the ring fingerprint of the left hand that was found on the taxicab and letter, and not the right?
CLICK IMAGE TO READ MORE If the Zodiac Killer had used scissors or a knife to cut the shirt of Paul Stine, he would have used his right hand, leaving his left hand free to secure the freed shirt piece. If he had immediately left the taxicab after performing this task, his left hand would have still been in possession of the shirt piece, which he could have then used to quickly wipe the door handle as he exited. Alternatively, he may have put the scissors/knife away while inside the taxicab and subsequently grabbed Paul Stine's wallet and Yellow Cab keys using his right hand, while still clutching the shirt piece with his left. As he departed the front passenger side of the taxicab he may have then pocketed the wallet and keys, obviously keeping the shirt piece in his left hand to wipe down the door handle. This would explain why a right-handed individual attempted to remove fingerprints with his left hand. So how was the bloody left ring fingerprint of Zodiac inadvertently deposited on the door handle?
Elimination prints were taken of responding personnel who attended the Presidio Heights crime scene, as they were of San Francisco Chronicle staff and members of the police department who touched the "Little List" letter mailed on .July 26th 1970. Therefore, the bloody fingerprint found on the taxicab and the latent left ring fingerprint retrieved from the "Little List" letter exhibiting similarities to one another, have a strong possibility of originating from the hand of our killer. Any fingerprints found on the inner pages of the five-page "Little List" letter (protected by the front of page 1 and the rear of page 5), one might expect to be the fingerprints of the author, had the San Francisco Chronicle staff ceased further examination once they read the introduction of "This is the Zodiac speaking". This, of course, assumes that the Zodiac Killer folded pages 1 to 5 in order. There should be very little to no reason why a machine produced writing pad should contain any fingerprints on its inner pages, other than that of the Zodiac Killer. Especially when using five consecutive pages over a constrained time period to author this letter.
Dion Walker summed everything up nicely, stating "Is it really so much of a stretch - so hard to believe - that it's probable for two latent fingerprints from two different surfaces, that had both been checked against elimination prints - and were almost certainly touched by the exact same man - were similar because they were left by the same man. I think it makes sense looking at the whole picture". If the left ring fingerprint of a "suspect" exhibited similarity to the left ring fingerprint from the "Little List" letter, which itself showed a similarity to the one retrieved from the tacicab of Paul Stine, this would be our starting point. The remaining seven latent fingerprints from the same letter could then be used to compare to other digits from the "suspect", which should reasonably effect an identification (or not) of the man who masqueraded as the elusive Zodiac Killer.
I would like to again thank Dion and Cragle for tackling this extremely labor intensive subject, and for three of the images used in the above presentation.
SEARCHING FOR THE PRINTS OF ZODIAC
AN INITIAL CUT TO THE LEFT SIDE [PART ONE]
AN INITIAL CUT TO THE LEFT SIDE [PART TWO]



















RSS Feed